Diagnosis

Once you have confidently identified a Low–level Convergence signature, this section will help you estimate the storm severity associated with it. Generally, the spatial and temporal scales of a signature are loosely related to the updraft strength. In other words, the larger and/or more long–lived the signature, the stronger the updraft that produced it. In velocity–based signatures, updraft severity can usually also be gauged by the magnitude of the measured radial velocities. Examining a storm’s overall temporal evolution will suggest whether the storm is becoming more or less severe. Radar signatures and associated storm developments can also be time–shifted relative to each other, as is the case in supercell tornadoes that occur during the collapse of the parent storm.

When comparing signatures to diagnose relative severity, keep in mind that it is assumed that signatures are sampled at equal ranges from the radar. Otherwise, a storm sampled at greater range (with a wider beam) can appear to be weak and/or weakening, while a storm sampled at a closer range (with a narrower beam) can appear to be strong and/or strengthening.

Degree of Severity

The following spatiotemporal attributes of a Low–level Convergence signature are linked to the strength of a collocated updraft:

  • Strength of the convergence – the stronger convergence, the larger the mass flux in the updraft base, therefore the stronger the updraft is likely to be.
  • Residence time of an updraft within the convergence zone – the longer the updraft resides within the low level convergence, the longer the updraft is being supplied with warm moist boundary layer air, which in turn should increase or at least support the updraft’s strength. This is especially applicable in moderate to strong deep layer shear environments where storms can be longer–lived.
  • Depth of the convergence – the deeper the convergence zone below an updraft, the more protected the moist, warm boundary parcels are from entrainment of drier environmental air aloft on their way to the level of free convection (LFC). Deeper convergence zones more effectively prevent the reduction of surface parcel CAPE values whilst parcels rise into and through the updraft (Ziegler et al., 1997).

Considering these aspects of the low–level convergence will help to determine overall whether you are dealing with a significant convergence signature. For a severe thunderstorm warning consideration, even a significant Low-level Convergence signature still requires additional evidence for storm severity from other signatures and should always be considered in conjunction with the near storm environment and any spotter reports.

Most Likely Convective Hazards

If a thunderstorm has been determined to be severe and possesses a Low–level Convergence signature of significance, the following severe weather should be considered to be included in the severe thunderstorm warning:

  • damaging winds – a strong updraft, with potential to produce a strong downdraft.
  • large hail – a strong updraft has the potential to produce large hail, providing the updraft extends into the hail growth layer, –10°C to –30°C.

Note that the Low–level Convergence signature below an updraft merely allows the conclusion that an updraft is likely to intensify, or at least maintain its current intensity. The hazards listed above, common with any severe convective storm, should be seen in the light of a continuing threat, rather than a tight link between the convergence signature and this particular hazard. See Conceptual Models for more details on why particular severe weather should be included.